3 ms·
I have a 65” 4K OLED. I would not want to use it in this situation with the risk of burn-in from static content. Moreover, any LED consumes way more energy to k
by fotta 6y ago
I have a 65” 4K OLED. I would not want to use it in this situation with the risk of burn-in from static content. Moreover, any LED consumes way more energy to keep the display always on, and in my mind that quality is a requirement for something like this. (Yes I know the Samsung Frame exists but I don’t think you can customize your content in Art Mode like this)
- GekkePrutser 6y agoNo, I didn't mean for that purpose. I just mean it's exceptionally bad price/performance for a display.
- atourgates 6y agoI think a Samsung Frame would probably be the closest replacement. $600 for the 32" version. $1,900 for the 65".
- 1-6 6y agoNot really there either. The 32” is 1080 instead of 4K. The cool/warm backlight is nice but you’re still working with a QLED (phosphors respond to a blue backlight, instead of white LED). You’ll still have a bit of black light leak. Still looking for reflective displays, not transmissive.