3 ms·
It is absolutely ridiculously expensive. You can get an amazing 65" OLED 4K display for that :P However, maybe he was able to buy it on his company or somethin
by GekkePrutser 6y ago
It is absolutely ridiculously expensive. You can get an amazing 65" OLED 4K display for that :P
However, maybe he was able to buy it on his company or something.. Part of office decoration expenses? If you're a software integration business I could imagine that would impress potential clients.
- fotta 6y agoI have a 65” 4K OLED. I would not want to use it in this situation with the risk of burn-in from static content. Moreover, any LED consumes way more energy to keep the display always on, and in my mind that quality is a requirement for something like this. (Yes I know the Samsung Frame exists but I don’t think you can customize your content in Art Mode like this)
- GekkePrutser 6y agoNo, I didn't mean for that purpose. I just mean it's exceptionally bad price/performance for a display.
- atourgates 6y agoI think a Samsung Frame would probably be the closest replacement. $600 for the 32" version. $1,900 for the 65".
- 1-6 6y agoNot really there either. The 32” is 1080 instead of 4K. The cool/warm backlight is nice but you’re still working with a QLED (phosphors respond to a blue backlight, instead of white LED). You’ll still have a bit of black light leak. Still looking for reflective displays, not transmissive.