> Not sure 100% adherence to an individual's particular political positions is the way to measure the worth and value of an organization. No one is asking the

> Not sure 100% adherence to an individual's particular political positions is the way to measure the worth and value of an organization. No one is asking the EFF to agree with everything RMS says. However it's quite ironical that the EFF deviated from its stated goal of protecting free speech [1] on the Internet and joined the lynch mob trying to cancel RMS. This does cast the EFF in a negative light since now there's speech that the EFF likes and speech they don't. As long as there's such a dichotomy, it's hard to take an organization claiming to defend free speech seriously. [1] https://www.eff.org/issues/free-speech https://www.eff.org/issues/free-speech