I don't think it would help. I could see ownership being interpreted either way: - the author owns this asset type and they publicly support it - they would be

I don't think it would help. I could see ownership being interpreted either way: - the author owns this asset type and they publicly support it - they would benefit from the price going up; maybe they just want to feed the hype. Therefore the author can't be trusted. - the author doesn't own the asset type and they publicly support it - their actions contradict their public opinion. Therefore the author can't be trusted. I would rather look into how good of an argument someone is making than trying to guess the reasoning behind their portfolio.