>But the right solution is still alternatives, not the government micromanaging and second guessing every single decision they make. Agreed! Perhaps a publicly

>But the right solution is still alternatives, not the government micromanaging and second guessing every single decision they make. Agreed! Perhaps a publicly funded (not advertising funded) digital public square which protects lawful speech could be a potential solution? >The difference is that slavery is inherently wrong, whereas deciding on your own internal membership policies for some club, or internet forum, or what have you, is not inherently wrong. What is and is not "inherently wrong" is subjective and always changing. Anyone who pretends that they do not believe in things which will be considered "inherently wrong" 10, 50, or 100 years from now has a god complex and is deeply ignorant of human psychology and history.