4 ms·

This quote is not from the article and is only tangentially related to the article.

• fnord77 6y ago
  it should be pretty clear where the quote is from.
  • gus_massa 6y ago
    Can I guess? Wikipedia? Never assume people will notice and understand correctly, it's much better to add a direct link. Anyway, it is very weird that the article talks about the 2020 announcement, but doesn't explain that is mostly debunked (as explained in your quote in the ggp comment).
    • goodcanadian 6y ago
      Contested, perhaps, but I think debunked is too strong of a term. I am acquainted with several of the people involved. While everyone makes errors from time to time, I find it very hard to believe Greaves, et al, would have been sloppy in any way. And, I think, the article was quite clear about the fact that the result had been called into question. Regardless, the article is about a different team, with a different instrument, and a different (historical) data set getting a result that may support the Greaves result. Talking about Greaves is largely tangential to the article.