3 ms·
It seems like the issue you’re pointing out relates to how groups get classified in a ‘physical heavy profession’, no? If the requirements are ‘low’ for that, i
by scrose 6y ago
It seems like the issue you’re pointing out relates to how groups get classified in a ‘physical heavy profession’, no? If the requirements are ‘low’ for that, it sounds like the label itself may be inaccurate and causing unnecessary confusion
- NicoJuicy 6y agoIt's not a one-time misclassified label, it's a continuous loop of unions trying to get more benefits for their "members" at any means possible. And the sensitivity of some of them would cause a disgrace for any politician to mention ( eg. because yes, teachers are important) I wouldn't call it inaccurate, but more like deceit.
- musingsole 6y agoMisapplying overloaded labels to sneak into benefit pools a group doesn't belong to is the bread-and-butter of bureaucracy. Once a union has solved the problems that lead to members losing fingers, they turn to regulatory capture like this.