6 ms·
That is not addressing the same claim though. That was refuting the theory that people were spreading about it being genetically engineered to be infectious to
by beowulfey 6y ago
That is not addressing the same claim though. That was refuting the theory that people were spreading about it being genetically engineered to be infectious towards humans.
- incrudible 6y ago> ...it being genetically engineered to be infectious towards humans That's literally what a gain-of-function experiment is. These are done to study how viruses interact with humans so that we can deal with them better. There's nothing sinister about it, such experiments are happening all over the world and they did happen in Wuhan.
- cheaprentalyeti 6y agoMaybe it's time for us to realize that some "gain of function" research can be weaponized and made sinister.
- dataflow 6y ago> That is not addressing the same claim though. Did you just reply to the sentence I quoted or did you click the links? The tweets are very obviously not limited to that: https://twitter.com/ehundman/status/1246598376377831425 https://twitter.com/ehundman/status/1246598376377831425 And honestly, it's hard to go from "this happened via natural selection" to "nobody dismissed this coming from a lab". Even if it's technically possible, surely you can understand why readers' message from this is not "this could have come from a lab".
- beowulfey 6y agoAlright, I’ll concede I should not have used the phrase “nobody”