4 ms·

It's usually not competitors that can hurt or even kill a product, it's substitute goods. Cart manufacturers in the early 20th century didn't see their business

It's usually not competitors that can hurt or even kill a product, it's substitute goods. Cart manufacturers in the early 20th century didn't see their business diminishing because of the sudden emergence of a better cart manufacturer, it has happened because of the invention of the automobile. Similarly, if something threatens Facebook's position, it's quite possible that it will be a substitute product, not a direct competitor. A significant substitute product of Facebook is real life interactions with your friends, for example.

dagw 15y ago
A significant substitute product of Facebook is real life interactions with your friends, for example. I think that's totally missing the point. I don't think anyone uses Facebook as a substitute for real life interaction. I imagine that most people use it partially to coordinate the meeting up with said friends and partially to interact with people whom, due geography or various life circumstances, it is infeasible to meet up with in real life. I doubt there are many people who'd rather sit at home and read their friend's Facebook updates if they have the option to pop around the corner and meet them face to face.
- DrJokepu 15y ago
  I know way too many people personally who do exactly that. I'll let other decide if it's a good or a bad thing, but in my experience an awful lot of people use social networks instead of real life interactions. I think those of us who live far away from our friends and family are in minority.
- chadgeidel 15y ago
  About half of my Facebook friends (IRL) are actually too far away to meet up with in real life. Facebook is a handy way to "keep up". Unfortunately they don't post as often as I would like - instead preferring to talk "face to face". :-(
jetz 15y ago
I agree that an incumbent is very hard to be beaten head-on. Examples: Google on search. Microsoft on OS or Office. Over time monopolistic players start to be everything for everybody. This may be just fine but in addition to that they promote bloat at the expense of their main product's usability. That's when new players emerge.

dagw 15y ago

A significant substitute product of Facebook is real life interactions with your friends, for example. I think that's totally missing the point. I don't think anyone uses Facebook as a substitute for real life interaction. I imagine that most people use it partially to coordinate the meeting up with said friends and partially to interact with people whom, due geography or various life circumstances, it is infeasible to meet up with in real life. I doubt there are many people who'd rather sit at home and read their friend's Facebook updates if they have the option to pop around the corner and meet them face to face.

DrJokepu 15y ago
I know way too many people personally who do exactly that. I'll let other decide if it's a good or a bad thing, but in my experience an awful lot of people use social networks instead of real life interactions. I think those of us who live far away from our friends and family are in minority.
chadgeidel 15y ago
About half of my Facebook friends (IRL) are actually too far away to meet up with in real life. Facebook is a handy way to "keep up". Unfortunately they don't post as often as I would like - instead preferring to talk "face to face". :-(

jetz 15y ago

I agree that an incumbent is very hard to be beaten head-on. Examples: Google on search. Microsoft on OS or Office. Over time monopolistic players start to be everything for everybody. This may be just fine but in addition to that they promote bloat at the expense of their main product's usability. That's when new players emerge.