2 ms·
It is a too charitable interpretation. Another interpretation of not requiring hard evidence is to imprison somebody just because police thinks that they look g
by d0mine 6y ago
It is a too charitable interpretation. Another interpretation of not requiring hard evidence is to imprison somebody just because police thinks that they look guilty.
Scientists are flawed. There is a replication crisis in soft science fields. Still scientific method is still a mile above anything else out there.