3 ms·
TFLOPS-equivalent-with-sparsity is not real TFLOPS. The article compared to A100's 312 TFLOPS which is much more reasonable.
by Veedrac 6y ago
TFLOPS-equivalent-with-sparsity is not real TFLOPS. The article compared to A100's 312 TFLOPS which is much more reasonable.
- my123 6y agoIntel didn't say what the TFlops number was about at all, we just don't know anything other than the headline.
- dragontamer 6y agoWe know the performance targets of the Aurora supercomputer though. The only way Intel reaches those performance targets is to outdo the current crop of GPUs: MI100 (from AMD) and A100 (NVidia). Not that that is a guarantee that we got a winner here, but we know the goal for what Intel is shooting for at least.
- arcanus 6y agoThe performance targets for Exascale are based on FP64, not ML-flops.