3 ms·
Your assumption is that every country is guaranteed to have access to underground places that are "geologically stable" over the required time-period, aren't aq
by chmod775 6y ago
Your assumption is that every country is guaranteed to have access to underground places that are "geologically stable" over the required time-period, aren't aquifers, or at risk letting water in by some other means.
The assumption is simply wrong.
- loeg 6y agoYou could throw it in the fucking ocean and it would be better than coal plants, and arguably better than natural gas.
- vidarh 6y agoYou could grind it up and intentionally pump it into the air, and it still would likely kill a tiny portion of the number of people killed by coal plants. I mean a whole lot of coal plants do pump uranium dust into the air. If you did it with the nuclear waste you'd pump worse isotopes into the air, but the volume would be tiny.
- yellowapple 6y agoHell, I'd bet you could mix it into soft drinks and sell it as "Nuka Cola Quantum" and it'd still be significantly less deadly than coal.
- sushisource 6y agoHow is that the assumption? There only needs to be one such place on the whole planet (or, shit, shoot it into space). I'm not saying it's easy (in fact, that was kinda my point), but it's absolutely possible and I didn't assume anything about individual groups needing their own storage.