Whats utterly disingenuous is if Safari was a third party app it would have to be blocked for the same reasoning they are using here for the OPs app. I used to

Whats utterly disingenuous is if Safari was a third party app it would have to be blocked for the same reasoning they are using here for the OPs app. I used to be doggedly pro-app store only with Apple as the gatekeeper (Google too for their ecosystem). But as more and more stories like this continue to appear, it's beyond obvious to me there needs to be a choice for alternatives to the app store to getting apps and if people want to "risk" getting content from other providers there should be a path to do so. Parlor is another recent one that no matter your opinion of them, booting an app solely for political content is beyond dangerous. If you think Parlor got booted for inciting violence, far worse was going on in Facebook and Twitter yet only Parlor got booted - it was purely political.