2 ms·
In a sense, we already had some taste of tech-powers-that-are blocking information that ended up being true ( Biden's Hunter drug issues ). edit: I am going to
by A4ET8a8uTh0 6y ago
In a sense, we already had some taste of tech-powers-that-are blocking information that ended up being true ( Biden's Hunter drug issues ).
edit: I am going to add some sources, since I am not certain why the downvoting is taking place on this particular comment. Not sure how the statement is controversial.
[Biden himself admits issues with drugs]https://www.businessinsider.com/hunter-biden-opens-about-addiction-struggles-divorce-new-yorker-2019-7 https://www.businessinsider.com/hunter-biden-opens-about-add...
[Same thing only in his book]https://people.com/politics/hunter-biden-to-release-memoir-detailing-substance-abuse-recovery/ https://people.com/politics/hunter-biden-to-release-memoir-d...
- nullserver 6y agoIt makes Biden look bad. If the issue had gotten full press coverage if might have flipped some states. It’s also a reminder that tech companies can now decide elections. Angry denial is easier then rational thought.
- lupire 6y ago"Hunter Biden's drug issues" were never blocked.
- A4ET8a8uTh0 6y agoI guess I will bite. What was blocked then?