3 ms·
You're only mentioning facts, but not all of the facts. The way you emphasised your comment as merely mentioning facts is making it obvious that you are select
by ipiz0618 6y ago
You're only mentioning facts, but not all of the facts.
The way you emphasised your comment as merely mentioning facts is making it obvious that you are selectively picking facts in favour of some narrative.
Care to mention how coordinated the "support XinJiang cotton" statements are? Like all the "support Hong Kong Police" posts before? I can also say I'm only commenting on the facts surrounding the situation.
It's interesting you mentioned Dilraba. If China can threaten Uighurs overseas, I wonder how one inside the country can wilfully oppose any propaganda.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- FooBarWidget 6y agoI apologize if it came over as claiming that those are all facts. It is not meant as an exhaustive list of facts. In fact, I declare that I am not able to list all facts exhaustively. I mentioned the facts that I know of, and that I think add something to the discussion (i.e. not things that people haven't already heard a million times). Since you believe I missed mentioning important facts, I implore you to elaborate them. This is not meant as sarcasm, I'm truly curious about what you can add. For example, you say that the statements are coordinated. Can you show examples and data?