3 ms·
> One con of LINQ to SQL is that it only supports MS's DBs. This is not true for Entity Framework (which is essentially the newest iteration of Linq2Sql.) I ha
by notJim 15y ago
> One con of LINQ to SQL is that it only supports MS's DBs.
This is not true for Entity Framework (which is essentially the newest iteration of Linq2Sql.) I have successfully used EF with SQLite in production, and it appears to have a MySQL driver as well (I honestly don't know how well the MySQL driver works.)
- stonemetal 15y agoThat is what I meant by LINQ to Entities, which is what I thought they were calling the new version. There are plenty of DB drivers(I think they call them providers) for EF.