4 ms·
The sad parts: * That team is still necessary for future changes and maintenance, including security and transitions. * The public sector has many institution
by mjevans 6y ago
The sad parts:
* That team is still necessary for future changes and maintenance, including security and transitions.
* The public sector has many institutions* where such a team should have tenure (and other work to fill the non-public works projects time).
Offhand, These institutions include the temples of information worship (libraries), information provisioning (higher education of all sorts; elementary and lower are for converting feral humans to educated people), and any civil engineers (civilian or military at any level).
- jordanbeiber 6y agoExactly. This wouldn’t as much rub me the wrong way had this been an effort of actual employees and staff at some govt agency where this were a longer term (indefinite?) initiative. At least then it turns in to: - mostly a zero sum game with my tax money - opens up for other, future, opportunities and lessons learned Hiring services from consultancies and third parties that after project end will “hand-off” to maintenance and operations to... another third party. I mean. Come on!