> More housing = more people = more revenue. That revenue turns into more infrastructure, more restaurants, etc. In an optimistic world, sure. It can also be

> More housing = more people = more revenue. That revenue turns into more infrastructure, more restaurants, etc. In an optimistic world, sure. It can also be that you build a bunch of building. Then, there's an economic downturn, and SF is fucked and left with abandoned buildings. There are cities that fell into this trap. I'm not saying it will happen, but it can happen. Growing slowly is a good way not to push yourself into that corner. How slow? I dunno. I hope there's an expert that can evaluate it.