4 ms·
Gas turbines that can run at 90% hydrogen and have existed for decades, still doesn't count as "existing" for you. And you still are pretending that steam power
by Hypx 6y ago
Gas turbines that can run at 90% hydrogen and have existed for decades, still doesn't count as "existing" for you. And you still are pretending that steam power plants running on hydrogen don't exist.
The fundamental problem is that you have created an argument that's so up your own asshole that it doesn't sense, and if applied to anything else nothing is green. All because you can't admit you were wrong. Everything else you're saying is just a red herring.
> Im going to bed now, and I should have realized I was being trolled much sooner.
You're projecting again.
- Manfredo_1 6y ago> And you still are pretending that steam power plants running on hydrogen don't exist. Yet again, you originally said we could use gas turbines for hydrogen storage. Not steam turbines. Of course steam turbines can easily be run off hydrogen, you don't need compressor blades, combustors, or anything special. Just a source of heat, a boiler, and a steam turbine. This is less efficient, so there's good reason to develop hydrogen gas turbines. You're the one who first brought up steam turbines when you changed the goal posts to saying we could repurpose coal plants instead of gas turbines. And good night.
- Hypx 6y agoExactly! You went so far up your own asshole in denying the existence of hydrogen combustion in industrial use that you even forgot about steam turbines. The whole point was showing how ridiculous it was to go this far. It would be easy to sacrifice a bit of efficiency for a simpler system that's guaranteed to work and the basic premise would've been the same. No one until you came along did anyone thought there could be any doubt that hydrogen gas turbine couldn't do the job. You could saved yourself all this trouble by just admitting you were wrong.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]