3 ms·
Well, on one hand at least the money goes directly to the one in need and not through the government as a middle man. There's no department heads or managers of
by animal_spirits 6y ago
Well, on one hand at least the money goes directly to the one in need and not through the government as a middle man. There's no department heads or managers of managers to pay in between this transaction.
- gruez 6y agoPros: no government "middle man" taking a "cut" (although I'd like to see how much % was used to administer the trump/biden checks, for instance) Cons: Totally arbitrary. Have a generous employer? Great! Stingy employer? Sucks for you. I'd also imagine that whether you'd get this kind of "relief" depends on your job, kind of like how waiters get tipped but fast food workers don't.