> Google would likely make it a priority to drop the Wikipedia blurbs, either without replacement, or with data sourced elsewhere. That's an odd way of phrasin

> Google would likely make it a priority to drop the Wikipedia blurbs, either without replacement, or with data sourced elsewhere. That's an odd way of phrasing things. If Wikipedia were to take away free access to their data, Google wouldn't be dropping Wikipedia, Wikipedia would be dropping Google. This line of thinking "you took this when I was giving it away for free, but now I want to charge for it, so you are expected to keep paying for it" is incorrect.