4 ms·
gitlab pages is better imo. You can use the CI to run any code you want to build the static files.
by foobar33333 6y ago
gitlab pages is better imo. You can use the CI to run any code you want to build the static files.
- gala8y 6y agoAlso, GitLab allows business websites in GitLab pages in free tier, as opposed to Netlify and Github. "With GitLab Pages, you can publish static websites directly from a repository in GitLab. Use for any personal or business website."
- lostmsu 6y agoGitHub allows business websites, AFAIK. Where did you get the notion, that it does not?
- bombcar 6y agohttps://docs.github.com/en/github/working-with-github-pages/about-github-pages#guidelines-for-using-github-pages https://docs.github.com/en/github/working-with-github-pages/... "GitHub Pages is not intended for or allowed to be used as a free web hosting service to run your online business, e-commerce site, or any other website that is primarily directed at either facilitating commercial transactions or providing commercial software as a service (SaaS)." Now one could read that as "don't build a SaaS on top of GitHub Pages", but you could also read that as "don't have business websites on GitHub Pages".
- shhsshs 6y agoThat wording specifically disallows both commercial sites and SaaS, so it should be read as both "don't build a SaaS on top of GitHub Pages" and "don't have business websites on GitHub Pages"
- lights0123 6y ago> You can use the CI to run any code you want to build the static files. That is Netlify and Cloudflare Pages' defining feature, and GitHub has had that for a few years now.
- jedbrown 6y agoNotably, it's easy to make a review site that integrates with a merge request so you can see it before deploying and get visual reviews any time you have multiple stakeholders. https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/ci/review_apps/ https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/ci/review_apps/