I thought about replying in more depth, but your last line is just... weird. > Clean, well designed and secure systems are nice and all but I don't a large maj

I thought about replying in more depth, but your last line is just... weird. > Clean, well designed and secure systems are nice and all but I don't a large majority of non-tech workers will agree that this standard trumps every other consideration when it comes to a functioning society. It doesn't seem fair that some tech workers like clean design and they deserve to dictate what is right and wrong in society. I didn't say "clean". I said "functioning correctly to their design". I'm willing to wager a "large majority of non-tech workers" would agree that things are preferably working rather than broken. Twisting a statement like that is very much in the domain of Eristic Dialectic. Please try to reduce your usage of such tools.