> Does not using a CDN impact performance in a crippling way that neither me nor the poster you're replying to understands? It adds up to 600ms of latency for

> Does not using a CDN impact performance in a crippling way that neither me nor the poster you're replying to understands? It adds up to 600ms of latency for each roundtrip. A modern website without link rel=preload is several roundtrips– download HTML page, then do JS requests and CSS, so that's ~1.2s of additional latency. Because he succumbed to AWS' marketing. Surge, mentioned downthread, lets you deploy a folder for free on a worldwide CDN with virtually no setup.