My biggest question is WRT to the tax subsidies that were given to companies like Twitter in SF, as well as Google (likely all over, but was thinking about the

My biggest question is WRT to the tax subsidies that were given to companies like Twitter in SF, as well as Google (likely all over, but was thinking about the NYC building) So - they were given subsidies to build/occupy there such that the claim was that it would stimulate and heighten the surround area and businesses... So if Twitter is 100% WFH option, then why give them massive subsidies when their well paid employee population is no longer present on-site? However, they may have already expired? https://time.com/14335/twitter-tax-break-san-francisco/ https://time.com/14335/twitter-tax-break-san-francisco/