4 ms·
True, it's probably little more then a coat of paint on it's house. That being said, they're probably paying more attention to those that just threw eggs all ov
by canadiancreed 15y ago
True, it's probably little more then a coat of paint on it's house. That being said, they're probably paying more attention to those that just threw eggs all over it, and if they chose, to act accordingly. Not like there woudl be much that would stop them.
- philthy 15y agoI agree with the coat of paint comment but if we have learned anything about government agencies or large corporations being hacked in the past it is that their Internet security practices can sometimes be painfully bad. @Below and HBGary was a IT security firm after all...
- dvdhsu 15y agoThe CIA should be relatively secure: they are an intelligence agency, after all. Breaching a intelligence agency's website will cause the agency to lose more face than a Senator does after his or her website is hacked.
- marshray 15y agoEither way, the result is a budget increase for "cyberwar operations".