5 ms·
I think England has a much longer history of habitation, and so it's understandable that deforestation is more extensive (thousands of years vs. hundreds). Here
by stakkur 6y ago
I think England has a much longer history of habitation, and so it's understandable that deforestation is more extensive (thousands of years vs. hundreds). Here's an article I like about that process in England:
https://aeon.co/essays/who-chopped-down-britains-ancient-forests https://aeon.co/essays/who-chopped-down-britains-ancient-for...
There are a lot of parallels in the US process of deforestation, except as you say on a much different scale. The US has lost ~75% of its virgin forests just since 1600.