I mean... That's explicitly addressed in the article,and not to make it personal, but it feels like you're inadvertently and very ironically proving his exact p

I mean... That's explicitly addressed in the article,and not to make it personal, but it feels like you're inadvertently and very ironically proving his exact point - finding a sentence, taking it out of context, and then working hard to disagree or go on a tangent to discuss your preferred topic / perspective. "Again, there's a vast and sprawling ecosystem of current and historical horrors that made this situation possible – but we can't say that it's a situation that could never occur in a just world, because even in just worlds, things get stuck." There's a million problems out there, but this one is a simple. And yet some will still find a way to ignore that particular simple yet important problem,to discuss their preferred problem. This is not to say that your point isn't valid and important and crucial and worthy! But I'm a lefty pinky socialist liberal from Canada,and even *I am exhausted and daily rolling my eyes how we can't discuss the weather or paint of my kitchen or anything without going into... Other stuff. (With that in mind I'm up voting your post as it definitely contributed to discussion,even if not in a way you maybe intended ; I don't like the habit of people down voting an opposing point of view ;-()