3 ms·

This is just wrong. Police are clearly above the law and it has been confirmed many times that they have literally ZERO obligation to put themselves at risk or

This is just wrong. Police are clearly above the law and it has been confirmed many times that they have literally ZERO obligation to put themselves at risk or protect you (at least in the US). There have been FIVE murder convictions of police officers since 2005: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1123386/convictions-police-officers-arrested-murder-charge-us/ https://www.statista.com/statistics/1123386/convictions-poli... Five minutes of research shows the Supreme Court has confirmed that police have no obligation to protect: https://www.barneslawllp.com/blog/police-not-required-protect https://www.barneslawllp.com/blog/police-not-required-protec...

austincheney 6y ago
Your law source misinterprets, possibly even misrepresents, that Supreme Court decision. In summary the court said: The court opinion, by Chief Justice William Rehnquist, held that the due process clause protects against state action only. Police action was never mentioned or effected by that case. Here is due process (5th Amendment): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Due_Process_Clause https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Due_Process_Clause Due process protects individuals from intrusion by the state. In that vein the case effectively says state agents without policing authority are not obligated to intervene as police would against private citizens.