3 ms·
> now they are losing a competitive advantage I don't think they're doing anything out of ideological reasons. Their bonuses and compensation is always tied to
by sn_master 6y ago
> now they are losing a competitive advantage
I don't think they're doing anything out of ideological reasons. Their bonuses and compensation is always tied to their competitive performance. I am sure the higher-ups weighed the potential loss of competitive advantage when making the decision, and given their successful track record, I am inclined to believe it's not going to be as bad as the article is portraying it.
- vkou 6y ago> I am sure the higher-ups weighed the potential loss of competitive advantage when making the decision, and given their successful track record, I am inclined to believe it's not going to be as bad as the article is portraying it. I'm sure they haven't - and are just reacting in the way that any C-suite American executive reacts to a union forming in their company - by making every attempt, sensible or senseless, to suppress it.
- sn_master 6y agoThey're the business owners and responsible for their business decisions. I don't think we have the decades of experience they have managing trillion-dollar organizations. This is the first time I am seeing that many people claiming they're upset because Amazon made a decision they think is bad for its own business.
- Spooky23 6y agoSenior Executives aren’t the Jedi council or whatever. Someone probably discovered somebody dumping the GAL and the big shots made an emotional decision.
- sn_master 6y agoAny intern can still dump the GAL, they only removed access for warehouse workers, not for software engineers.