1) Stories like that, where 2000 years old historic injusticies are discussed, remind me of the Trial of Socrates.. The trial of Socrates was held to determine

1) Stories like that, where 2000 years old historic injusticies are discussed, remind me of the Trial of Socrates.. The trial of Socrates was held to determine the philosopher's guilt of two charges: asebeia against the pantheon of Athens, and corruption of the youth of the city-state; the accusers cited two impious acts by Socrates: "failing to acknowledge the gods that the city acknowledges" and "introducing new deities". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trial_of_Socrates https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trial_of_Socrates ..which was 'repeated': https://www.onassis.org/whats-on/new-trial-socrates https://www.onassis.org/whats-on/new-trial-socrates 2) This guy just wants to make a name for himself, he will be invited for interviews etc. It would make 'some' sense to have this in a philosophical/theoretical/acamedic context, in a way how university teams debate for A vs B. But this is just rediculous..