It's really absurd that the claim RMS was condemned about is a proposition that an act without intention is not a crime. That is, if a Mavin Minsky had a sex wi

It's really absurd that the claim RMS was condemned about is a proposition that an act without intention is not a crime. That is, if a Mavin Minsky had a sex with a person whose age is less than the legal age without knowing a person's age, it's not a crime. At least, that's true in my jurisdiction. And there still is no proof Marvin Minsky had a sex in Epistein's place. Nobody claimed that, even the victim women at that time. Social Justice Warrior movement is gone extreme in RMS's case.