4 ms·
It's not really irrational or some behavior that they'd change if they did introspect. I suspect a significant portion of these people are internally like "Yea
by nostrademons 6y ago
It's not really irrational or some behavior that they'd change if they did introspect. I suspect a significant portion of these people are internally like "Yeah, I'm part of the problem now, but the problem is not going to go away if I don't join in on it, I'll just get screwed."
In other words, they understand game theory and tragedy of the commons.
- cassepipe 6y agoYes but you have to recognize that there is something irrational in the perception of the problem. How do you go from -> a lot of fragile and old people are going to die to -> omg I am going to be starved to death ?
- batpangolin 6y agoI think there were two fears. One is that you might want to stay in your house for a long time without having to go and get groceries. Either because you are quarantining, or because you're very afraid of catching a dangerous virus if you go out. Having plenty of food in the house could be the difference between having to take a risk and avoiding that risk. Secondly I think a lot of people worried, rationally or not, about a 'breakdown of society'. If there is enough death and disease then maybe everything stops working. People don't go to work, transport and food production break down, there is looting and widespread lawlessness, and so on. Perhaps it's very hard to get food, or impossible to get some foods, or some form of government rationing starts. In that case having a stockpile could be very valuable.