3 ms·
It is definitely a downward spiral sort of situation. The gravitation of such people to the few remaining areas that are still "20-minute neighborhoods" or som
by rossdavidh 6y ago
It is definitely a downward spiral sort of situation. The gravitation of such people to the few remaining areas that are still "20-minute neighborhoods" or something close to it, increases the pressure on them such that people move out (to neighborhoods which are suburban or at any rate less central).
It also causes businesses (especially small ones which cannot afford private security) to move away, which erodes one of the objectives of this approach, which is to have small businesses of many sorts in the neighborhood. People may, in the abstract, like the fact that the business is tolerant of the poor and mentally ill, but they don't want to walk past them to go to that business. Definitely it's a bad, self-reinforcing situation.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- shkkmo 6y agoPortland is a city with a significant homeless population that also has a lot of little neighborhoods that are similar to the 20 minute concept. You don't see the homeless population in those areas at nearly the same rates as downtown or near the areas where encampments are. Thus your assumption that these areas will attract homeless populations would appear to be inaccurate.