Redefining words to get's one way is now a staple of contemporary discourse. The problem with any policy of dismissing commentary that is disrespectful is that

Redefining words to get's one way is now a staple of contemporary discourse. The problem with any policy of dismissing commentary that is disrespectful is that the definition of disrespectful will simply be changed until all contrary arguments have been banned for being disrespectful. How many times over the past year have common words suddenly had new definitions added to them for political expediency? Seems like quite a bit and we're told "no, that's always been part of the definition" even while print evidence and cached Internet Archive records show otherwise.