Higher foot traffic, some homeless services, maybe police action elsewhere? Specifically am referring to the plateau mont royal neighbourhood. There, the homel

Higher foot traffic, some homeless services, maybe police action elsewhere? Specifically am referring to the plateau mont royal neighbourhood. There, the homeless congregate on mont royal avenue. It is long, has a metro station, plentiful bus routes, a monastery that provides homeless services and food, a library across from the metro. Lots of stores and foot traffic all throughout the day. I’m in Halifax now for a few months and the homeless people (who congregate on spring garden) seem more aggressive for whatever reason. In Montreal they were never a bother. There were definitely long term homeless as I saw many of the same faces over the years. Could be a lower number, but I think part of the issue is shelter. For instance SF has no more homeless per capita than NYC, but they have a massively higher number of unsheltered homeless, which causes a lot of problems both for the city and for the homeless. But NYC also has many more “homeless amenable” areas than a place like SF, which has a fairly small walkable area. My central point is if you built like Montreal and NYC then the entire city is walkable and the problem is less concentrated and thus much less bothersome. (There are homeless elsewhere in Montreal. But in my specific neighbourhood only one street has them)