3 ms·
It was just a very good, no-bs type of service. With good-looking performant UI (it was before "material" UI conquered almost all other google services). Not th
by deepsun 6y ago
It was just a very good, no-bs type of service. With good-looking performant UI (it was before "material" UI conquered almost all other google services). Not that I'm against Material, I do my websites on it, but I have to admit previous google design was more intuitive.