Some constructive criticism to submitter/author: You're not noticing that you're inadvertently referring to "solutions" in multiple meanings which leads to fal

Some constructive criticism to submitter/author: You're not noticing that you're inadvertently referring to "solutions" in multiple meanings which leads to false equivalence: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivocation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivocation E.g. "solution" in "they are solutions, and you shouldn’t learn to use solutions" in your 1st paragraph is referring software tools -- but 2nd paragraph of "solutions" in "bring me solutions, not problems" is about answers or actions to take irrespective of tools. Because of the above confusion, I think a more accurate title and angle for your essay is "Learn about problems, not specific software tools" ... because people do care about solutions in the generalized non-software-tool sense. E.g. the recent mRNA vaccine is a "solution" to slowing down COVID that's crippling the world. Also, the following is hard to parse and could use some wordsmithing: >"(AI is kind of hot, but there are a a ton of wannabe data scientists and few open roles, while the opposite is true for DevOps, study linear algebra and probability theory, either, React, it’s hype),"