> instead want RMS especially because he does not submit to what feels convenient at the time? That's some cheeky phrasing. > FLOSS is permanently under attac

> instead want RMS especially because he does not submit to what feels convenient at the time? That's some cheeky phrasing. > FLOSS is permanently under attack, from the industry Sure it is, and having a spokeperson that act very poorly in public does not help a bit. > from the legal framework Huh? > NOT going with the flow is exactly what us other people expect RMS to do. What is "the flow"? Doing very weird things in public? Hitting hard on women at conferences? Pleasing corporations? > why not do the OpenSource-thing and fork the organisation? We did: Conservancy, EFF, FSFE are thriving. (Why are you assuming we didn't?)