2 ms·
I read the whole article. It really irks me that a scientist would dress up their ideological views and call it science (or "science-informed"). Whether you agr
by yosito 6y ago
I read the whole article. It really irks me that a scientist would dress up their ideological views and call it science (or "science-informed"). Whether you agree or disagree with the views presented, if something is more about interpreting how we ought to live, rather than about examining evidence, it's not science. Calling controversial opinions science undermines public trust in science.
- mdpopescu 6y agoMaybe "public trust in science" SHOULD be undermined? I mean, I can definitely understand the appeal of "but my priest / pastor / president / doctor / scientist said that...", but I think it leads to a bad result overall. Man, I am SO BORED today.