3 ms·
I like Kevin Kelly's point of view, which he talked about recently on David Perell's podcast: "When the first humanoid picked up a rock and turned it into a ha
by jp555 6y ago
I like Kevin Kelly's point of view, which he talked about recently on David Perell's podcast:
"When the first humanoid picked up a rock and turned it into a hammer, either to make a shelter or to kill his brother, he suddenly had a new choice he never had before. That choice is good. You see what I’m saying? Even the choice to do evil is itself a good. Which means that if there’s a 50/50 wash between good and evil, the fact that there’s another choice gives it a 1% edge.
So there’s 51% versus 49%. So that’s why I say that given everything, even the choices to do evil are a good, that we have 51% good and 49% bad. That 1 or 2% Delta, the tiny, tiny little bit better, the incremental creep of goodness and betterment compounded yearly is civilization. All we need is to have 1% better. What we need to do is create 1% more than we destroy. Then we have civilization. And by the way, 1% it’s almost invisible. Look around the world and say, half of it’s crap. Yes, it’s true. There’s only a 1% tiny bit, but that 1% difference, that little tiny bit, is all that we need. And that little tiny bit comes from, even the evil choices are choices and those choices are good. It’s good to have a choice."
Kevin Kelly
- Engineering-MD 6y agoOr alternatively the ability to control minds reduces the number of choices you do good as it consolidated power in fewer people. Therefore under your model it increases evil.
- earthboundkid 6y agoThis is assuming you're the hominid making the choice and not the hominid to whom to the choice is applied.