4 ms·
I don't understand the wording. He says "when I saw your message. At that time all I could see was what was in your message. At the same time I sent another
by bhaak 6y ago
I don't understand the wording.
He says "when I saw your message. At that time all I could see was what was in your message. At the same time I sent another message to get a copy of https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-11/msg00888.html https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-11/msg00888.html. That arrived subsequently."
Doesn't that mean he received the original posting after all?
> Oh well.
If you ask me that shows poor leadership. Everybody does make mistakes but not reflecting on those mistakes and trying to do better will result in getting left behind.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- lifthrasiir 6y ago> Doesn't that mean he received the original posting after all? I assume that he received the original posting but wasn't aware of the contents ("I am stunned to see that we had this offer", note the use of tenses). FWIW he uses an email to fetch emails from the external inbox, so it seems likely that it just got shelved for a decade.