3 ms·
From the link you posted: > Even though an employee has fewer employment rights in the first two years of their employment, an employer would be foolish to ass
by dx034 6y ago
From the link you posted:
> Even though an employee has fewer employment rights in the first two years of their employment, an employer would be foolish to assume they have carte blanche to dismiss at will.
So while it's true that there's less protection for workers, there is no at will employment in the UK. Probation period probably comes closest to it but is much shorter.
- carmen_sandiego 6y agoWhat are you talking about? The US doesn't give carte blanche either. Discrimination law exists. Other labor laws exist. Exactly as this article refers to as being 'not carte blanche' in the UK. 'At will' in the US and the 2 year qualifying period in the UK are practically identical, apart from that the UK has a 2-week statutory notice period. The protections that remain in both the US and UK are almost entirely about protected classes. Even the classes themselves are virtually the same. "Have they been there less than 2 years?" is the first thing legal will ask you when you want to sack someone in the UK. It's a wholly different status to being protected after the period.
- stuaxo 6y agoAlthough now we have "Inside IR35 Contractors" - which is in effect a zero rights employee. I wonder how long until that is the standard.