4 ms·
The Guardian ran a few alarmist articles on them going back a while which might have sparked some of the outrage, including this opinion piece [1]. It turns out
by tweetle_beetle 6y ago
The Guardian ran a few alarmist articles on them going back a while which might have sparked some of the outrage, including this opinion piece [1]. It turns out these "dark satanic mills" are often: hot, without windows and cold in winter.
I don't advocate for bad working conditions, but it must be hard for anyone who has ever worked in a kitchen to keep a straight face when reading that. Even many Michelin starred kitchens are horrible environments.
[1] https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/oct/09/dark-kitchens-satanic-mills-deliveroo https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/oct/09/dark-k...
Edit: This isn't meant to be whataboutism, just pointing out that a "ghost kitchen" is only really different from a normal kitchen in its business structure. By and large, catering is not, and has never been, a glamorous industry. If you want to stop kitchens being difficult places to work, that's a worthwhile cause, but much, much bigger than Deliveroo.
- corobo 6y agoIt would be better to report those too rather than dismiss something because something else is worse.
- arkitaip 6y agoSo what if the rest of the industry is terrible, how does that make ghost kitchens acceptable?
- FartyMcFarter 6y agoIt doesn't make ghost kitchens acceptable. However it does mean that it's misleading to criticise ghost kitchens specifically, while implying they're worse than other kinds of restaurants.
- Griffinsauce 6y agoIt's not the fact that it's a ghost kitchen that's bad right? It's the poor treatment of workers. Focusing on a poor correlation is not solving the core problem.