3 ms·
Also, I’d add that a feeling of having contributed something meaningful to the world is something like a basic human need. You won’t die if you’re fed, sheltere
by ianai 6y ago
Also, I’d add that a feeling of having contributed something meaningful to the world is something like a basic human need. You won’t die if you’re fed, sheltered, and have access to clean water. But if that’s literally all you do in a day you will soon be fiddling for something to do.
So instead of rushing to exclude people from society, society needs to provide people enough room to be themselves to keep from dangerous fiddling.
Further, forgiveness is a more critical tool to the forgiver than the forgiven. To forgive a grievance isn’t to forget it. It’s to put an end to the part of your resources devoted to punishing your opponent or thinking ill. That frees up those resources for more positive uses. The forgiven never needed to expend resources to earn your forgiveness and thus doesn’t have the same resource commitments - hence forgiveness offers less to the forgiven than the forgiver.
- Nbox9 6y agoIn this situation forgiveness has has offered a board seat to the forgiven, which is something of considerable value.
- jamienicol 6y agoI can confidently say I've devoted zero resources to punishing Stallman, other than a few comments on this thread. Yet his benefit from the board's forgiveness is quite clearly large. There's a big difference between excluding someone from society or even contributing to a project, and appointing them to the board.