How can domination by nature be irrelevant to political philosophy? There's never been a famine in a liberal democracy. Compare to the Holodomor. We can't "abs

How can domination by nature be irrelevant to political philosophy? There's never been a famine in a liberal democracy. Compare to the Holodomor. We can't "abstract" things that are immanent when we do political philosophy. If we do that we're chasing soap bubbles.