3 ms·
I question whether the move away from x86 is actually that much of a problem for Intel; ultimately, its just an instruction architecture, and at the end of the
by 015a 6y ago
I question whether the move away from x86 is actually that much of a problem for Intel; ultimately, its just an instruction architecture, and at the end of the day the fabrication capacity is far more valuable than some old & busted IP. There's no reason to believe Intel couldn't adapt to an ARM-based future; they would just need the leadership to step in and make that investment. They haven't made it thus far, but I also legitimately believe its a fair decision not to; its not obvious to me, just some guy with nothing to lose, that my next server, or gaming desktop, or laptop, will or should run an ARM chip. Windows hasn't moved that way, not more than the nanometer Surface Pro X moved it, Linux hasn't outside of Android, really the only company that has said "yeah we're all in on ARM" is Apple. Well, they have their sandbox they play in, and it certainly influences the rest of the industry, but ultimately it is separate.
- als0 6y agoThere’s a rumour that AMD are making an ARM chip for OEMs that want to compete with Apple.
- Aperocky 6y agoAt what point does a chip stop being ARM and become AMD? Cortex series are pretty potent for commodity chips. Now Apple does have their completely different cores that just happen to use ARM instruction set, but I think most fabless are not focused on the cores themselves.
- als0 6y ago> At what point does a chip stop being ARM and become AMD? I should have said arm64 chip. AMD is fabless and they do spend a lot of effort on core design.