L not for "libre" but for "liberal as in education"? (Which "open source" should already cover, and was the reason for free/libre as something distinct.) At lea

L not for "libre" but for "liberal as in education"? (Which "open source" should already cover, and was the reason for free/libre as something distinct.) At least he acknowledges the root word at the end... And then another new term presented as if it should be as familiar as "shareware" is "public software". This is very confusing to read.