4 ms·
One of the worst tings about this is the kind of protective actions they employed. It seems like they made a filter that automatically banned anyone mentioning
by sorenjan 6y ago
One of the worst tings about this is the kind of protective actions they employed. It seems like they made a filter that automatically banned anyone mentioning a certain name, in order to protect that person from harassment. They didn't care about whether the comment was harassing or not, they didn't warn the person making the comment, they simply removed it and banned them. Very heavy handed and sloppy, and I think there's something they're not telling. They knew there would be reactions about this person and thought they could hide them. The person got employed in December and the filter was added in March.
- darkwizard42 6y agoEven worse...the filter was added March 9 and the employee removed today March 24. So they either were grossly incompetent about the issue or they thought this "shadowbanning" was an effective solution!