3 ms·
Guilt by association is probably fair game here...in her capacity at reddit she was working on subreddits that involved younger adults/teenagers. Do you think t
by darkwizard42 6y ago
Guilt by association is probably fair game here...in her capacity at reddit she was working on subreddits that involved younger adults/teenagers. Do you think that would be okay?
If she was a software engineer or working on marketing, I would not advocate for her to be removed from reddit.
Much of the controversy is that this was an admin with control over subreddits which there is clear public information that perhaps they aren't best suited for.
- hombre_fatal 6y agoWell, once again, you're treating her as if she was the one convicted of pedophilia. Do I think someone associated with a pedophile should be treated like a pedophile? No. Our justice system and legal ethics certainly don't believe in a transitivity of guilt like that. We'd consider that extremely unfair. In my eyes, a large component of cancel culture is when we ignore all that because we like the result.
- darkwizard42 6y agoIt was her father...who she chose to employ as her campaign manager AFTER it was already known about his crimes. It wasn't just someone in her extended friend circle or a passing acquaintance. I think she shouldn't be treated as a pedophile. I think she should be treated warily in positions that involve youth. That feels like a pretty reasonable concern.
- hombre_fatal 6y ago> I think she shouldn't be treated as a pedophile. I think she should be treated warily in positions that involve youth. These statements don't square. Barring them from employment isn't just wariness. Hiring her pedo dad is definitely a bad choice for a political campaign and it looks bad. That's different than: can't be trusted alone in a room with a child or can't be trusted to run a forum.
- ALittleLight 6y agoWould you trust this person to watch your children?
- tmotwu 6y agoWho is moderating your child's Instagram posts? As someone who knows some Facebook Moderation TPM's, you might not like the answer.
- darkwizard42 6y agoMaybe you should report this behavior to the right folks. If this comes up as public information and we know that Facebook was aware of it, yes I’d rightfully be angry. Making a bad argument here I think.
- tmotwu 6y agoNot making any sort of argument, just addressing some facts. It's in response to "Would you trust this person to watch your children?" That is why it's not public information. See how it only matters when it's public? Product managers certainly aren't responsible for the actions of others, either. Social media moderation is not a task many are willing to take, certainly one that some badly behaved individuals might be interested in.
- geoduck14 6y agoI think the outrage might be coming from many people hoping that Reddit holds its self to a higher bar. The other mods might like Reddit to be a site where they let their kids surf freely.
- tmotwu 6y agoWho actually believes reddit is a promising site for children? Unlike Facebook/Instagram, reddit is already 50% pornography with very low barriers of harassment and cyberbullying (due to pure anonymity).
- koolba 6y agoDo you think someone associated with pedophilia should be in a position of power moderating comments by and about youth?
- hombre_fatal 6y agoWell, be more specific. "Associated with pedophilia" ranges all the way to a child rape conviction. Do I think someone who once hired a pedophile should be treated like one? No. Does the law or legal ethics think so? No.